Indulge me while I go runner nerd in this post.
I've always liked to look at numbers and collect information on race splits on a race that I've run. It serves to show at what stage of the race I ran well, what didn't go so well and how I could improve for next time.
Below is a table of my times and splits at Paris, and how I did compared to my expected goal time of 3:10.
Net Time | Split Time | Expected Goal Time Split | Surplus/Deficit | ||||
5 km | 00:22:55 | 00:22:55 | 00:22:30 | -25s | |||
10 km | 00:45:24 | 00:22:29 | 00:45:01 | -23s | |||
15 km | 01:07:20 | 00:21:56 | 01:07:32 | 12s | |||
Half | 01:34:00 | 00:26:40 | 01:35:00 | 60s | |||
25 km | 01:51:11 | 00:17:11 | 01:52:34 | 83s | |||
30 km | 02:13:32 | 00:22:21 | 02:15:05 | 93s | |||
35 km | 02:36:03 | 00:22:31 | 02:37:36 | 93s | |||
Finish | 03:08:53 | 00:32:50 | 03:10:00 | 67s | |||
Half 1 | 01:34:00 | ||||||
Half 2 | 01:34:53 |
Net Time is the actual race time I recorded at each point in the race, e.g. at 15 km I recorded 1:07:20. Split Time is the time taken for every 5 km split, e.g. it took me 22:21 to run from the 25 km to 30 km mark. Similarly, it took me 32:50 to run from the 35 km mark to the finish. Expected Goal Time Split is the expected time I needed to run at to meet my 3:10 target, e.g. in order to stay on target at 25 km I had to be at or under 1:52:34. Surplus/Deficit represents how much time I was in front or behind at each stage of the race, where a negative number represented the deficit I needed to make up.
Obviously I'm very happy with these figures. I had a typically slow start, where I spent the first 15 km trying to wipe a deficit. Once I did that, I continued to build a surplus all the way into the 30 km mark. But the most surprising thing was that I was able to hold goal pace in the latter stages of the race when I was tiring. With a 93 second buffer at the 35 km mark, it was just a matter of holding on for the remaining 7 km and thankfully I only managed to lose 26 seconds off my surplus in the end!
The pacing in the first and second halves was also pretty spot on. While it ended up being a small positive split, even the very best runners in the world win races with these sorts of time differences between halves.
No comments:
Post a Comment